| PAGE 03 |
|
If you can experience
heaven and God now, with the LSD trigger catalyst and then come down
from the trip and return to "normal" life or consciousness,
imagine how amazingly unbelievable it will be to realize what happened
and where you were. No one will believe you unless they have also been
there, but regardless of that, you will know what is meant when people
talk about revelations, discoveries, wisdom, insights, increased awareness
and perception, all impossible without LSD.
Is all of that just a bunch of baloney? If so, then why have so many people who have done LSD insist that it's true? Are they all stupid? Was Timothy Leary and the people involved with his LSD research at Harvard University stupid? Harvard people are among the smartest people, not the stupidest. It may have never been put this way but LSD is an electrifying, fascinating, beautiful, sparkling, dazzling, radiant, glowing, glorious, awesome, divine, heavenly, joyous, sensuous, euphoric, ecstatic, majestic, magical, magnificent, miraculous, sensational, spectacular, exciting, intense, dramatic, overwhelming awakening of experience and that is putting it mildly because no words can do justice to this experience. It is a trip, journey, voyage or pilgrimage to paradise, Eden, heaven and God. What more do you want? Whatever you want out of your life can be infinitely better with an LSD awakening of your life. That is the point as much as anything else. In the mid 1960's, all research on LSD was banned. Scientists who thought that they were doing research on LSD and thought that they knew something would say that they cannot try LSD because it would ruin their objectivity. It's another way of saying that being ignorant about a subject is what qualifies someone to make a judgment on that subject or that having experience in something makes someone unfit to judge that experience because they had the experience and that only someone without the experience is fit to judge it. This, of course, is absurd. Even a 4 year old kid knows that if he or she has tasted ice cream, then they know what it tastes like and can judge it as good or bad. The 4 year old also knows that anyone who has never tasted ice cream can't possibly know what it tastes like. Which person is the expert on ice cream? Is it the one who has had it many times or is it the one who has kept their "objectivity" and never had it? An adult can study the history of ice cream, what it's made of, how it's made, where it's made, how much is made, how much it costs, etc. All of this is superficial fluff if the adult has never actually tasted ice cream because the 4 year old child who has tasted ice cream knows what it is and the adult doesn't. If a 4 year old can understand a certain, simple concept, then why is an entire society so confused about that same concept? It should be seen as common sense that if someone has not experienced something, then they cannot know what the experience is all about. With LSD, this is especially true. It doesn't matter if someone has 10 Ph. d. degrees and an IQ of 500. The only credential that can make someone knowledgeable, in any way, about LSD is to have had the experience. Any person who has tried LSD and had what I call the LSD experience, knows more about it than any person who has not, regardless of who the people are. That may sound like a stretch, but it isn't. |